Orphan enzymes

Here’s an interesting study from BMC Bioinformatics: abstract and provisional PDF (354 KB).

Using computational database searches, we have demonstrated previously that no gene sequences could be found for at least 36% of enzyme activities that have been assigned an Enzyme Commission number. Here we present a follow-up literature-based survey involving a statistically significant sample of such orphan activities. The survey was intended to determine whether sequences for these enzyme activities are truly unknown, or whether these sequences are absent from the public sequence databases but can be found in the literature.

We demonstrate that for ~80% of sampled orphans, the absence of sequence data is bona fide. Our analyses further substantiate the notion that many of these enzyme activties play biologically important roles.

This survey points toward significant scientific cost of having such a large fraction of characterized enzyme activities disconnected from sequence data. It also suggests that a larger effort, beginning with a comprehensive survey of all putative orphan activities, would resolve nearly 300 artifactual orphans and reconnect a wealth of enzyme research with modern genomics. For these reasons, we propose that a systematic effort to identify the cognate genes of orphan enzymes be undertaken.

We’re familiar with orphan genes: those sequences with no homologs or predicted function. Surprisingly, many well-characterised enzyme activities cannot be linked with a gene sequence. Is this because enzymes are purified and assayed but the protein is not sequenced, or because enzyme databases don’t integrate well with sequence databases, or both? It’s not clear from the article, but it’s surprising and interesting.